CategoriesConference article

New pub: Are rubrics all you need? Towards rubric-based automatic short answer scoring

The latest paper led by Sebastian Gombert has been published in the Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK26).

"Are rubrics all you need? Towards rubric-based automatic short answer scoring via guided rubric-answer alignment"

In educational assessment, rubrics are central because they define clear criteria for evaluating learner responses and specify what counts as relevant evidence. Yet, most automatic short answer scoring approaches make little to no explicit use of rubrics, or treat them only as additional side information. This paper turns that around and asks what happens if rubrics themselves become the primary scoring reference for automated systems.

The authors introduce the task of rubric-based automatic short-answer scoring, in which the model uses the scoring rubric as an explicit anchor rather than relying solely on large sets of labelled student responses. To implement this idea, they propose a guided rubric–answer alignment, in which each student's answer is aligned directly with rubric criteria and level descriptors rather than with other answers.

Building on this concept, the paper presents two new transformer-based architectures, GRAASP and ToLeGRAA, which use attention mechanisms to focus on the most relevant rubric information when predicting scores. These architectures aim to make scoring more transparent and more faithful to the assessment design, and they promise greater robustness when tasks change because the scoring logic is driven by the rubric rather than solely by historical training data.

This work aligns with a broader agenda in our group: designing AI systems that are tightly coupled with pedagogical artefacts such as rubrics, feedback guidelines, and learning objectives, instead of treating AI as a detached black box. By placing rubrics at the centre of the modelling process, this research opens a path towards more interpretable, educator-aligned automatic assessment tools that can better support teaching and learning.

Check it here (Open Access PDF via ACM):

Gombert, S., Sun, Z., Zehner, F., Lossjew, J., Wyrwich, T., Czinczel, B. K., Bednorz, D., Kubsch, M., Di Mitri, D., Neumann, K., & Drachsler, H. (2026). Are rubrics all you need? Towards rubric-based automatic short answer scoring via guided rubric-answer alignment. Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 272–282. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3785022.3785064

CategoriesJournal article

New pub: Through the Telescope: A Systematic Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems

The systematic literature review led by Gianluca Romano has been published in the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education by Springer Nature

"Through the Telescope: A Systematic Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Their Applications in Psychomotor Skill Learning"

This review fits in with our broader effort as a group on how AI can be supportive for psychomotor skills, i.e. those skills which require mind-body coordination, and that have a high degree of physicality.

The article systematically reviews "Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)" and finds that current ITS primarily support fine, simple, and technical skills, such as those in medical and sports training.

We highlight gaps in addressing complex, gross, and open skills. For the future of the field, we call for ITS to incorporate broader physical skill dimensions, personalised feedback, and training theories to achieve more effective, holistic skill development. In the future, we expect ITS to move beyond repetition and expert comparison toward adaptive, theory-driven learning support.

Check it here Open Access 🔓

Romano, G., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D. et al. Through the Telescope: A Systematic Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Their Applications in Psychomotor Skill Learning. Int J Artif Intell Educ (2025). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-025-00526-1

CategoriesConference article

New publications at the ECEL conference 2025

Two new publications from our team expanding the Presentable (www.presentable.info) ecosystem!

First, led by the brilliant Nina Mouhammad“From Nervous to Noteworthy: Evaluating SPEAKS, an Educational Software for Speech Content” explores the message composition component of Presentable. SPEAKS serves as a crucial pillar that distinguishes the platform from previous research on presentation training systems. Full paper available (Open Access): https://papers.academic-conferences.org/index.php/ecel/article/view/4104

Second, we are excited to share “Evaluating WEBPOSE, a Posture Feedback System for Oral Presentations”, research led by Stefan Hummel with contributions from Mohamad AlomariNina MouhammadJan Schneider Barnes, and Roland Klemke.

Both papers, to be presented at the 24th European Conference on e‑Learning at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) under the leadership of Md. Saifuddin Khalid, presents the first results of a web-based prototype for training presentation rehearsal.

WEBPOSE has already been integrated into the latest version of Presentable, further strengthening its multimodal feedback capabilities. Full paper available (Open Access): https://papers.academic-conferences.org/index.php/ecel/article/view/4285

CategoriesJournal article

New pub: key technical features of automated feedback systems - a systematic feature analysis

New publication alert from the HyTea project titled "Enhancing presentation skills: key technical features of automated feedback systems - a systematic feature analysis", led by PhD candidate Stefan Hummel

The article presents a systematic analysis of oral presentation automated feedback systems (OPAFs), which are designed to support public speaking through automated feedback mechanisms.

Our study assessed 14 existing systems across a comprehensive set of 83 functional features and 12 additional aspects. Although there is an increased interest in these systems, we found that the overall implementation rate of key features remains low at just 16%, with notable gaps in critical areas like verbal-nonverbal congruency, adaptive feedback, and content structuring.

Moreover, evaluation methodologies tend to focus heavily on usability and user experience, while aspects such as learning outcomes and pedagogical value are often overlooked. The majority of studies are lab-based, which raises concerns about the generalisability of findings to real-world educational environments.

Our findings emphasise the importance of improved feature integration, real-world testing, and closer collaboration with educators to help transition these tools from experimental prototypes to effective educational technologies.

This is the first journal article published about the HyTea project and contributed substantially to building a solid foundation for Presentable (www.presentable.info).

This milestone was especially significant as it marks my first article published as the last author. Well done, Stefan, thanks to my co-authors and everyone who supported this research.

Paper available Open Access 🔓 here
https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJTEL.2025.148593

CategoriesPresentations

Talk at the CALRG group of the OUUK

In this talk, I give an overview of "Presentable" (https://presentable.info), an AI-driven system that enhances presentation skills through automated feedback.

Presentable guides users in creating and rehearsing presentations, offering immediate corrective feedback on voice and body language. This system exemplifies how multimodal data and intelligent algorithms can provide retrospective feedback and intelligent support.

The talk was given at the Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) of The Open University in the UK. Thanks, Fridolin Wild, for inviting me.